No posts with label In a very recent Southern District of Ohio case, the “substantially related” aspect of former client conflicts was illustrated favorably. Huey Jiuan Liang v. AWG Remarketing, Inc., N.D.Ohio No. 2:14-cv-0099, 2015 LEXIS 43755 (Apr. 2, 2015). In that case, a law firm represented an entity in 2007 to review its intellectual property agreements. Id. Then, in 2009 it represented the entity to file its certificate of incorporation. Id. Later, the firm represented an entity that sued the former client for copyright infringement. Id.. Show all posts
No posts with label In a very recent Southern District of Ohio case, the “substantially related” aspect of former client conflicts was illustrated favorably. Huey Jiuan Liang v. AWG Remarketing, Inc., N.D.Ohio No. 2:14-cv-0099, 2015 LEXIS 43755 (Apr. 2, 2015). In that case, a law firm represented an entity in 2007 to review its intellectual property agreements. Id. Then, in 2009 it represented the entity to file its certificate of incorporation. Id. Later, the firm represented an entity that sued the former client for copyright infringement. Id.. Show all posts
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)